5 Circular Fashion Examples for Inspiration

Sharing is caring!

In this article, I’ve included some outstanding circular fashion examples that offer inspiring insights into how some companies not only apply circular principles but thrive because of it.

I’ll provide some background on why circular fashion is not just relevant, but essential for the future. This will give you the grounding to understand the circular fashion examples better.

What circular fashion means and why it matters

Fashion has wrestled with its waste problem for decades, but circular fashion offers a solution that actually works. The concept sounds straightforward: keep clothes in use longer through repair, resale, and rental, then remake everything when its first life ends. The execution demands rethinking everything about how clothes are made.

Circular Fashion: Some Statistics

The numbers tell a sobering story:

• Global fibre production hit 124 million tonnes in 2023, setting a new record. Polyester alone accounts for 57% of that mountain. These figures translate directly into microfibres washing into oceans and the continued dependence on fossil fuels. This isn’t about distant problems; it’s about the clothes hanging in closets right now.
• The waste story hits even harder. The UN reports roughly 92 million tonnes of textile waste generated annually, yet only 8% of textile fibres come from recycled sources.
• Recent analyses estimate the industry uses on the order of 79 trillion litres of water per year. A large share of this occurs in dyeing and finishing: textile dyeing alone is responsible for about 20% of global water pollution. (source: Global Fashion Agenda).

The vast majority of materials remain virgin, meaning each season’s production requires mostly new cotton, oil, etc.

• Recycling rates: Globally ~92 million tonnes of clothing waste arise each year, yet <1% is turned into new fabric. Only ~8% of fibers used in clothing come from recycled materials (textile-to-textile recycling is under 1% of fiber volume).
• Value lost: This inefficiency is costly: analysts estimate over US$100–460 billion worth of material is discarded each year. For example, consumers “lose about US$460 billion of value” annually by throwing away clothes that could have been reused or resold.

A Framework for Circular Fashion

The shift to circular fashion requires abandoning linear “take, make, dispose” models. Instead, fashion becomes a continuous system where materials flow through defined stages, always returning to productive use. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s circular economy principles provide the foundation: eliminate waste and pollution, keep products and materials in use, and regenerate natural systems.

Five stages structure this circular approach:

• Source: Select materials based on their ability to cycle safely. This means choosing recycled or renewable inputs, avoiding harmful chemistry, and ensuring materials can separate easily for future loops.
• Produce: Transform raw materials into fabrics using processes that enable circularity. Production methods must preserve material quality for multiple cycles while minimizing water, energy, and chemical use.
• Make: Construct garments for durability and disassembly. Strong construction extends first use while modular design and compatible materials enable efficient recycling when products reach end of life.
• Use: Maximize value during the product’s active life through care, repair, and sharing. Longer use phases mean fewer new products needed and less waste generated overall.
• Circular Flows: Route products back into the system through established pathways. Collection, sorting, and processing infrastructure ensures materials return to Source stage rather than becoming waste.

Two Essential Enablers of Circular Fashion

Design and transparency operate across all five stages, making circularity possible.

Design serves as the decision gate throughout the system. By adopting the principles of the circular economy, critical design choices can be made. At Source, design determines material selection. During the Make phase, design choices have a significant impact on durability and disassembly. In Use, design influences care requirements and repairability. Design isn’t decoration; it’s the series of choices that determine whether a garment gets one life or many.

Transparency with traceability creates accountability. Materials need verified origins and processing histories. Chemistry requires disclosure to ensure safety in future cycles. Working conditions demand documentation to maintain ethical standards. Without transparent data flowing from Source through Circular Flows, the system cannot optimize or improve.

Circular Fashion Hierarchy of Value

Once products enter Circular Flows, pathways preserve different levels of value:

• Reuse: Keeps products intact with minimal intervention. A jacket sold secondhand retains all its material value and craftsmanship. Energy requirements stay minimal, just cleaning and minor refurbishment.
• Repair: Extends product life through targeted fixes. Replacing a zipper or patching a tear maintains most original value while requiring only small material inputs and skilled labor.
• Remake: Transforms products into new forms. Converting damaged jeans into shorts or updating an outdated silhouette captures value that would otherwise disappear. Remaking requires more energy than repair but less than creating new products.
• Recycle: Breaks products into constituent materials. Mechanical recycling shreds textiles into fibres while chemical recycling dissolves polymers for reformation. Quality typically decreases, but materials stay in the system.
• Compost: Returns biological materials to soil. This option only works for uncontaminated natural fibres with proper industrial composting infrastructure. Composting represents final exit from the technical system.

Economic Benefits Drive Adoption

When we take a look at some of the circular fashion examples, we will see how some brands are applying these methods to extend the life of the product and the materials. In essence, these methods demonstrate that circular approaches can deliver measurable returns:

• Rental services generate recurring revenue from single items, transforming inventory into assets that produce income over extended periods
• Repair programs reduce warranty costs while building customer relationships through service touchpoints that strengthen brand loyalty
• Take back schemes secure consistent feedstock for recycled collections while reducing dependence on volatile virgin material markets
• Resale platforms capture value from secondary markets, keeping revenue within brand ecosystems instead of losing it to third parties
• Design for durability commands premium prices while reducing return rates, building reputation for quality that customers will pay for

Now we have a base point understanding of the principles we can move to the 20 circular fashion examples and show how and what they are doing to be circular.

Circular Fashion Examples

Leading brands prove that circular models work at scale, generating both environmental benefits and business value. These examples show different entry points into circularity, from luxury resale to mass market rental to innovative recycling partnerships. Each circular fashion example demonstrates that circularity isn’t theoretical anymore; it’s an operational reality delivering measurable results.

1. Eileen Fisher – Circular Fashion Designer

Among circular fashion examples, Ellen Fisher proves that repair can be both practical and profitable.

Eileen Fisher launched the namesake brand in 1984 with a clear promise to make comfortable clothing that improves women’s lives.

That ethos of simplicity evolved into a broader commitment to social and environmental stewardship, now expressed through a scaled take-back and remanufacture program that keeps garments in circulation.

The company is B Corp certified and 40% employee-owned, anchoring accountability in both community and staff. Together, these choices create a business that designs for longevity and builds responsibility into how clothes are made and remade.

At Eileen Fisher, the Four R’s translate circular intent into everyday operations, using customer returns and thoughtful design to keep clothing in active use. Each R maps to a clear pathway that reduces new production and directs garments to their best next life, from repair and resale to remanufacture.

• Reduce: Large scale recirculation displaces new production. Since 2009 the program has diverted about 1.2 million Eileen Fisher garments from landfill into reuse, repair, remanufacture, or resale. 
• Repair: Returned items are mended and cleaned before resale through Renew and the Reworn site. 
• Reuse: Customers return pre owned pieces in any condition and receive store credit. Usable items are resold through Renew stores and online. 
• Recycle: Garments too damaged to repair are deconstructed and remade into new Resewn designs at the Tiny Factory in Irvington, New York.

The core principles of Eileen Fisher underpin its approach to materials and sourcing, emphasising take-back streams, design for deconstruction, and remanufacture.

• Materials and sourcing: The principal feedstock is the brand’s own take-back stream. Renew collects pre-owned items, sorts and cleans them, and routes them to repair, resale, or Resewn remanufacture.
• Program design details: Creative lead Lilah Horwitz develops three limited Resewn collections per year that are made from existing garments and marketed as one of a kind pieces created from nothing new.

2. Reformation

Of the circular fashion examples worth studying, this one ties customer incentives to returns.

Reformation began in Los Angeles in 2009 when Yael Aflalo turned a small vintage shop into a label that treats sustainability as style, not sacrifice. From the outset, the mission was bold and straightforward: to make responsible fashion desirable by combining feminine design with superior materials and transparent supply chains.

Local manufacturing, where possible, keeps production close to home, improving oversight and speed. The result is a brand that invites customers to love what they wear and how it was made.

Four R’s focus:

• Reduce: Prioritises better fibres and design for longevity to cut virgin inputs, with a stated path to circularity by 2030 and climate positive by 2025. 98 per cent of materials used in 2024 were recycled, regenerative, or renewable, and 26 per cent of materials were deadstock, recycled, or next generation, which reduces demand for new resource extraction. 
• Repair: Offers alterations and repairs through Hemster to extend wear, with nearly thirty thousand items repaired or altered in 2024.
• Reuse: Runs integrated resale with Poshmark for one click listings and a long running Clean Out partnership with thredUP, alongside in house vintage. In 2024, resale, vintage, and rental represented nine percent of business volume.
• Recycle: Operates RefRecycling with SuperCircle to collect and route returned Reformation items into textile to textile or other recycling solutions, expanding acceptance across categories.

The core principles:

• Materials and sourcing: Utilises a fibre standard that prioritises cellulosics, including Tencel Lyocell, recycled cotton, and regeneratively grown cotton. Increased deadstock sourcing from 7.5% in 2023 to 13.6% in 2024. Piloted next-generation inputs, such as Cycora by Ambercycle, and fabrics made with Circulose.
• Designed for disassembly: Primary emphasis is on recyclability, low-impact care, and design for disassembly rather than compostable garments, though select accessories use bio-based inputs with biodegradable components. 
• Notable choices: Synthetics represented about 10% cent of fibre use in 2024, of which only about 20% were virgin, equal to roughly two per cent of total sourcing, supporting a transition away from fossil fuel-derived inputs.

3. Allbirds

For circular fashion examples that test and validate the market, this is a standout.

Allbirds took shape in 2015 when former New Zealand professional footballer Tim Brown teamed up with biotech entrepreneur Joey Zwillinger to turn a simple idea into a footwear company grounded in nature and low carbon design.

Brown had experimented with merino wool shoes during business school, even winning a New Zealand wool industry grant and raising the first funds on Kickstarter, while Zwillinger brought deep expertise in renewable materials after working in algae-based fuels, a pairing that set the tone for material innovation from day one.

Their personal networks helped spark the partnership, and the company grew from its New Zealand roots to a San Francisco headquarters with a clear credo to make better things in a better way by replacing petroleum-based synthetics with natural alternatives.

Four R’s focus:

• Reduce: Low-impact material choices cut virgin petrochemicals and product footprint, including tree-fiber Tencel Lyocell uppers and sugarcane-based SweetFoam midsoles developed to lower carbon versus conventional EVA. 
• Repair: No formal repair service is disclosed; Allbirds provides care and cleaning guidance to extend wear. 
• Reuse: Allbirds ReRun, operated in conjunction with Trove, enables the trade-in and resale of gently used pairs, thereby extending product life and reducing demand for new production. 
• Recycle: The 2025 Remix sneaker uses Circ filament lyocell made from recycled textile waste for the upper, midsoles from recycled foam via Blumaka, and recycled polyester laces, showcasing textile-to-textile pathways.

Core principles

• Materials and sourcing: Core inputs include responsibly sourced Merino wool, FSC-certified tree fiber Tencel Lyocell, and sugarcane-based SweetFoam developed with Braskem’s bio-based EVA; Allbirds has also piloted plant-based leather with Natural Fiber Welding.
• Notable milestones: ReRun resale launched in 2022 to extend product life, and Allbirds has pursued progressive low-carbon designs, culminating in the M0.0NSHOT net-zero carbon shoe concept unveiled for commercial release beginning in 2024. 

4. Boody – Circular bamboo

In the landscape of circular fashion examples, this brand integrates reduce, reuse, and recycling of materials.

Boody began in Sydney in 2012, founded by long-time friends David Greenblo and Neil Midalia. Greenblo built his career in fashion, and Midalia came from pharmacy, a combination that shaped the brand’s comfort and wellness positioning. Today, their sons, Shaun Greenblo and Elliot Midalia, help lead the company as managing directors. Boody is a Certified B Corp with a current B Impact Score of 134.4.

Body’s focus is on Everyday essentials that feel good and do good through softer fabrics, responsible sourcing, and simple designs that encourage long wear rather than constant replacement.

Four R’s focus:

• Reduce: Preference for lower impact fibres, notably bamboo viscose and bamboo lyocell, which independent analysis reports as using less blue water and energy than conventional cotton. Boody also knits many garments in tubes to cut waste. 
• Reuse: The take back programme works on a reuse first principle. They also upcycle when necessary, and in North America Boody offers the Second Life Bag through Retold to route items for another life. 
• Recycle: The Goodness Loop with UPPAREL invites customers to return any brand’s cotton or bamboo garments for recycling and provides a store credit that offsets the shipping fee. Boody reports more than twenty three tonnes diverted from landfill through this channel. 

Principles

Materials and sourcing: Core feedstock is FSC-certified bamboo-derived viscose and lyocell, with brand-level data indicating that about sixty per cent of total fibre use comes from bamboo-based fibres. Boody participates in CanopyStyle to avoid sourcing from ancient and endangered forests and maintains PETA-approved vegan status for products. 

Notable milestones: First underwear brand in Australia and New Zealand to achieve B Corp certification in 2021 and recertified with a score of 134.4 in 2025. The Goodness Loop launched in 2023 in partnership with UPPAREL, while the Second Life Bag provides a similar route in the United States and Canada.

5. Patagonia – Worn Wear and the Repair Wagon

This stands in the top tier of circular fashion examples by extending product life through repair.

Patagonia began with a simple promise. Build gear that lasts, reduce harm in how it is made, and help people keep using what they already own. The company took shape in 1973 when climber Yvon Chouinard turned years of craft and mountain pragmatism into a brand that stood for durability first and new purchases second. 

Chouinard’s path explains the product philosophy. He started as a teenage climber in Southern California who learned metalwork to forge his own pitons, then led a shift to clean climbing hardware when he saw steel tools scarring the rock. That maker mindset carried into clothing. Patagonia grew out of a small gear shop and a few rugby shirts that proved there was a market for tough, honest apparel built for real use. The same spirit shaped the business culture that followed. 

Patagonia is a founder led story in two voices. Yvon set the bar for environmental action and for giving back. Malinda Chouinard shaped the look, fit, and day to day culture, and pushed for practices that supported families at work, including on site child care that started in 1983 and became a model many others studied. Together they treated the company as a place to prove that careful design and responsible operations can live inside a commercial brand.

The legal structure reinforces the mission. On 3 January 2012 Patagonia became the first company in California to register as a benefit corporation, aligning duty with social and environmental purpose. It is also a Certified B Corporation through B Lab. A decade later, the family moved ownership to two entities. The Patagonia Purpose Trust holds voting shares to safeguard the mission and governance. The Holdfast Collective holds nonvoting shares and receives profits not reinvested in the business to fund environmental protection. The intent is direct and durable. Keep the company focused on its reason for being. Use profits to protect the planet. 

Targets match the rhetoric. Patagonia has stated a goal to reach carbon neutrality by 2025 and has tied that ambition to material choices, supplier energy, and product design that lowers emissions across the chain. Public goals also include removing virgin petroleum inputs from products and moving packaging to full reuse or recyclability on a similar timeline. It is a long job, but the milestones set a clear course of travel. 

Underneath the headlines is a steady drumbeat of craft and care. Catalog essays that challenge overconsumption. Store teams that teach repair and maintenance. Product guarantees that reward long use. The message never really changed. Buy less. Use what you own for longer. Fix it when you can. Replace only when you must. 

Four R’s focus:

• Reduce: Public messaging encourages fewer new purchases and longer use, which lowers production and associated impacts. 
• Repair: Worn Wear offers free multi brand repairs through mobile tours and an expanded repair facility that completes about fifty thousand repairs per year. Patagonia also partners with iFixit to publish do it yourself repair guides. 
• Reuse: The Worn Wear platform enables trade in and resale of secondhand Patagonia items, both at events and online at wornwear.com. 
• Recycle: The brand uses organic and recycled inputs across products, and even the mobile repair wagon was built from reclaimed redwood wine barrels and runs on biodiesel. 

Principles

Materials and sourcing: Use of organic and recycled materials is embedded in product lines. The Worn Wear model further sources its inputs from customer returns and previously owned garments that are repaired and returned to use.

Notable milestones: Patagonia’s Worn Wear repair wagon is a biodiesel-powered mobile workshop that travels to campuses, shops, and events to mend clothing for free and teach simple do-it-yourself fixes, keeping gear in use rather than in landfill. Built in 2014 by artist Jay Nelson from reclaimed redwood, it began touring North America in 2015, expanded to Europe in 2016, reached South America in 2018, and arrived in Japan in 2019. The momentum from the road program supported a broader circular ecosystem, and in 2017, Patagonia launched wornwear.com, a dedicated marketplace where customers trade in and buy repaired gear.

6. Rent The Runway – Keeping Clothes in Use

This is one of the circular fashion examples that proves renting garments instead of buying them can command trust.

While not the classic circular fashion example, Rent The Runway is noteworthy because it keeps garments in use for longer.

Rent the Runway began in 2009 when Jennifer Hyman and Jennifer Fleiss, classmates at Harvard Business School, turned a simple family insight into a new way to access fashion. The spark came after Hyman watched her sister overspend on a dress she would wear once, which led the founders to test a campus popup and confirm that renting could deliver both joy and value.

Early guidance from Diane von Fürstenberg pushed them to build a multi-brand platform, and the site launched on November 10, 2009, with an explicit promise to swap ownership for access. Over time, the service expanded from one-off rentals to subscriptions and resale, anchoring a broader circular model around high utilisation of each garment. The journey reached a public milestone in October 2021 when the company listed on Nasdaq under the symbol RENT.

How it works in practice

• Access over ownership: subscription and one time rentals that displace demand for newly made garments, with RTR tracking garments potentially avoided and resource savings. 
• Centralised care and repair: every return is cleaned using tailored wet, dry, spot, or hydroxyl processes, steamed at high temperature, inspected for quality, and mended by in-house seamstresses to extend life. 
• Reuse-minded packaging: garments ship in reusable bags, with plastic covers and hangers taken back and routed to recycling through Trex, and hangers cleaned and reused.
• Second life pathways: items that no longer meet rental standards are sold through sample sales or resale partners so they continue to be worn rather than stored or discarded. 

Summary of Circular Fashion Examples

These circular fashion examples demonstrate that circular fashion is not only feasible and viable, but it can create incredibly strong brand communities.

I’ve summarised below the key takeouts from these circular fashion examples:

1. Repair & Maintenance — prolonging garment life through servicing

How it applies to circular fashion:
Most garments are discarded for fixable reasons: a broken zip, loose seams, scuffed leather, lost buttons. Designing for durability and offering easy, affordable repairs keeps clothes in use and delays replacement.

• What it is: In-house or partner services for cleaning, mending, re-hemming, resoling, re-zipping, re-proofing, and care guidance for customers.
• Why it matters: Extends wear per item, lowers total impact per use, and reduces demand for new fiber, dye, and cut-and-sew throughput.
• How it works in practice: Repair counters in stores; mail-in mending; care apps with wash routines; spare parts kits; visible mending programs; warranties that include free fixes.
• Business impact: Stronger brand loyalty and repeat visits; steady service revenue; higher resale value for well-maintained pieces; proof of quality that supports premium pricing.

2. Reuse & Redistribution — enabling second-life use by new wearers

How it applies to circular fashion:
Many garments have long physical life but short emotional life. Curating second-hand channels keeps style circulating and avoids premature disposal.

• What it is: Take-back, thrift, peer-to-peer resale, rental resale, and brand-certified pre-owned storefronts with authentication.
• Why it matters: Increases total wears per garment and diverts items from landfill; substitutes for new production.
• How it works in practice: Trade-in credits for returns; white-label resale shops on brand sites; peer resale integrations; capsule “archive” drops; school uniforms and kidswear swap schemes.
• Business impact: Access to value-sensitive customers; fees and margins on resale; demand data on what holds value; reduced inventory risk through circular flows.

3. Refurbishment & Remanufacturing — restoring garments to as-new condition

How it applies to circular fashion:
Quality items can be professionally renewed. Industrial processes can disassemble, replace, and reassemble components so clothing and footwear re-enter the market at near-new quality.

• What it is: Deep cleaning, re-dyeing, re-stitching, panel replacement, resoling, re-lasted footwear, and reassembly using salvaged components.
• Why it matters: Captures embedded value in cut, make, trim, and materials at a fraction of new cost and impact.
• How it works in practice: Factory refurb lines for denim and outerwear; leather bag restoration; sneaker resoling and midsole replacement; graded quality tiers with warranties.
• Business impact: Lower bill of materials per unit; new price points for entry customers; reduced write-offs; evidence for durability claims.

4. Recycling — turning post-use textiles into new feedstock

How it applies to circular fashion:
When garments are beyond wear or repair, fiber recovery keeps material in the loop. Both mechanical and chemical routes are used depending on fiber type.

• What it is: Mechanical fiber recovery for cotton and wool; chemical depolymerization for polyester and cellulose blends; trims and hardware removal to purify streams.
• Why it matters: Reduces reliance on virgin fiber, dye, and water; builds local material resilience.
• How it works in practice: Sorted take-back by fiber; de-trimming; shredding into staple fibers for yarn; chemical recycling for poly-cotton to regenerate polyester and cellulose; closed-loop use in new collections.
• Business impact: Supply diversification; recycled-content lines with credible provenance; compliance with emerging recycled-content targets; potential cost stability over time.

5. Cascading & Repurposing — using fashion by-products as inputs elsewhere

How it applies to circular fashion:
Cutting rooms and returns generate valuable side streams. Not every textile can go back to apparel; cascading finds the highest next use to avoid waste.

• What it is: Directing offcuts, deadstock, unsellable returns, and post-consumer textiles into accessories, interiors, insulation, stuffing, cleaning textiles, or artful upcycling.
• Why it matters: Maximizes utility across multiple product lives when fiber-to-fiber is not viable.
• How it works in practice: Patchwork and quilting of deadstock; leather scrap to small leather goods; knit waste to beanies and scarves; non-wovens from mixed fibers for acoustic panels; denim to insulation.
• Business impact: New SKUs from sunk materials; reduced disposal fees; cross-industry partnerships; storytelling value for limited runs.

6. Organic Feedstock — value from renewable, regenerative biological cycles

How it applies to circular fashion:
Bio-based inputs and regenerative practices reduce dependence on finite resources and improve soil and ecosystem health, while end-of-life can return safely to nature when designed correctly.

• What it is: Responsibly grown natural fibers, regenerative agriculture, bio-based dyes and finishes, compostable bast fibers, and biodegradable trims; anaerobic digestion or composting for certified compostable products.
• Why it matters: Lowers chemical and fossil inputs, supports biodiversity and soil carbon, and enables safe nutrient cycles at end-of-life.
• How it works in practice: Verified regenerative cotton, wool, hemp, or flax; plant-based dyeing; compostable sewing threads and elastics in capsule lines; take-back to industrial compost for qualifying garments.
• Business impact: Differentiation through credible sustainability attributes; supply security from healthier farming systems; eligibility for nature-positive claims and financing linked to environmental outcomes.

Circular Fashion Examples – References

Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T. & Gwilt, A. (2020) The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(4), 189–200. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-020-0039-9

Sandin, G. & Peters, G.M. (2018) Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 353–365. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618305985

Jia, F., Yin, S., Chen, L. & Chen, X. (2020) The circular economy in the textile and apparel industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120728. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620307757

Colucci, M., Vecchi, A. & Ramsey, E. (2021) Close the loop: Evidence on the implementation of the circular economy from the Italian fashion industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 856–873. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bse.2658

Farrant, L., Olsen, S.I. & Wangel, A. (2010) Environmental benefits from reusing clothes. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(7), 726–736. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-010-0197-y

Wiedemann, S.G., Yan, M.-J., Henry, B.K., Murphy, C.M. & Thoma, G. (2021) Reducing environmental impacts from garments through best-practice garment use and care using the example of a Merino wool sweater. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26, 1953–1969. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-021-01909-x

Andini, E., Ramezani, M., Parviainen, T., Pap, T., Sainio, T. & Oasmaa, A. (2024) Chemical recycling of mixed textile waste. Science Advances, 10(32), eado6827. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ado6827

Munasinghe, P.N., Kim, K. & Lee, S.H. (2021) A systematic review of the life cycle inventory of clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128864. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652621030481

Abrishami, S., Hong, H., Aitchison, P., Blackburn, R.S. & Hurren, C.J. (2024) Textile recycling and recovery: An eco-friendly approach towards circular fashion. Textile Research Journal, 94(19–20), 4001–4024. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00405175241247806

Amasawa, E., Murakami, K., Kuroda, M., Wolf, M.-A., Nakatani, J. & Hirao, M. (2023) Can rental platforms contribute to more sustainable fashion consumption? Comparative environmental impact assessment in Japan and Germany. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 7, 100093. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784323000049